Wednesday 14th July, 2004

 

Opinion

 
 
 
 
G-Spot
Sunshine Magazine
 
Letters
Online Community
Death Notices
 
Advertising
Classified Ads
Jobs in T&T
Contact Us
 
Archives
Privacy Policy
 
 
 

 

Surrendering our rights

By Prakash persad

ppersad@eng.uwi.tt

Recently, I cut down my avocado tree. Why? Because I could not get a single one!

This was a tree that I had planted and nurtured for many years, eagerly anticipating the day whence I could, on a regular basis, enjoy roti, fried aloo and tasty buttery zaboca.

But that was not to be. They would be stolen, year after year, before they even had a chance to fully mature.

I rationalised that if this avocado tree was the reason for thieves entering my property, then I had better get rid of it, for once they felt comfortable stealing zabocas, they would grow bolder and then start stealing other things around the house.

I gave up my right to enjoy the fruits of my labour for neither the law nor the fence and barbwire proved to be effective deterrents.

Some might say, “Marn, you still lucky, we had to give up our livelihood.” They would then proceed to relate how after backbreaking labour and big expenses they are forced to spend their nights guarding their produce and crops, risking their lives in the process, if they wanted to reap their produce before the thieves did.

Praedial larceny, it would seem, has become an alternative approach to agriculture, for the thieves, that is. We have moved from subsistence farming to parasitic reaping. The hopeless cries of the hapless farmers seem to neither serve nor protect their interests. The situation with those who own small citrus estates is no different.

No wonder then that so many estates are left to ruin and there is a movement away from agriculture. Many have surrendered their rights to a fulfilling pastime and livelihood through agriculture, for they are not provided the security to which they are entitled.

It does not require much maths to realise that no security for the farmers means no food security for the country.

Weddings are most significant social occasions. It has been the tradition, especially among the women folk, not only to don their best threads but also to flaunt their jewelry at these events. The heavy hands of the bandits have resulted in this aspect of our culture being denied.

Most folks no longer keep jewelry at home and many are terrified to wear it, even at private functions. The right to the enjoyment of golden accoutrements, the right to savour the special feeling endowed by being bedecked in ornate heirlooms have had to be surrendered through fear for personal safety.

Over time we have continuously given ground to the initially creeping but now raging barbarism that pervades society. We have adjusted our lifestyles and modified our homes, at considerable expense, only to find that the lawless want us to yield even further.

Well, enough is enough. No more surrendering, no more retreating. Citizen T&T must now assert the God-given right to live free from fear and to enjoy the fruits of hard work. The rights of the law-abiding, productive majority cannot and should not be held hostage to the destructive few and their publicity-seeking lawyers.

The public apathy and lethargy must be replaced by the determination to reclaim our country and our freedoms. This will not be achieved by the endless chatter on the electronic media, which quickly becomes an end unto itself, if one were to judge from the contents and contributors on the talk shows. As the saying goes, talk is cheap.

God helps those who help themselves, so we need to both pray and act. Every person, every neighbourhood, every village and every community needs now to join the battle against the lawless barbarians, their apologists and their supporters.

We must insist on a zero-tolerance policy on thieving and banditry. The laissez-faire attitude of the Police Service towards these offenders cannot continue.

The idea is not to bash the service but to point out the shortcomings that not only undermine the public confidence but also embolden the criminals, petty and otherwise.

By way of example, a little over 18 months ago, thieves broke into one of our facilities and stole some equipment. Upon discovering the loss, we made a quick survey of the surrounding area and followed the trail of trampled grass and fallen pieces of stolen equipment to a hangout.

All the information was reported to the police, including who the likely suspects were. When after two weeks we enquired if any investigation had been done, we received the following incredible reply: “Did you all not catch the fellows?”

Naturally, we did not pursue the matter any further.

The tendency to treat small crimes like stealing fruits, etc as non-issues has contributed to the present-day lack of respect for the property of others. This, coupled with the advocates of the rights of criminals, has resulted in the abrogation of the rights of the law-abiding. Today we live in fear, under siege from the criminal elements.

We must come together, irrespective of our political affiliations, as a country to unite to free ourselves of this scourge. We urge the Government to adopt a proactive and inclusive stance in leading this effort.

Responsibility is the flip side of authority and hence those in authority cannot dismiss or shirk their responsibilities.

Prakash Persad is Chairman of Swaha Inc

 

 

 

©2003-2004 Trinidad Publishing Company Limited

Designed by: Randall Rajkumar-Maharaj · Updated daily by: Sheahan Farrell