We have a huge institutional church which in many ways
is alienated from the real problems of the world and is involved
in trying to preserve traditional theologies and traditional
standpoints which seem irrelevant to human problems.
Father Shay Cullen
I cant say there was a time during his life when I actually
cared what Pope John Paul II was up to. I never really saw
any link between me and some dude chilling in the midst of
all the riches the Vatican, like so many other western European
imperialist powers, had stolen from native cultures around
the world.
I cant say I ever spared a thought for what kept Karol
Wojtyla awake at night.
Since his death, I guess Ive also been moved to think
about him. Not that Ive been given much choice since
everything else came to a standstill and all the international
news networks became preoccupied with entrenching John Paul
into modern mythology.
Now that he is gone and Im here watching the faithful
mourn him, I wonder what he would have thought of that vast
outpouring of adulation.
I also wonder if he ever felt the focused waves of fire
and damnation and judgment called on his head for upholding
the legacy of decimation that is the Roman Catholic by my
Rasta bredrin and sistren.
I mean, did he ever consider how strange it was for an old,
white, celibate man in the First World to make decisions on
the sexual and reproductive rights of a poverty-stricken young
Andean woman with three children and a husband demanding she
do her wifely duties?
Infallibility is neither here nor there with me, but I hope
he finds rest after 26 years of service to a world of people
who may or may not have appreciated the sacrifices he made.
A man. A man of flesh and blood and insecurities and inconsistencies.
Who tried to live his life in the path of a king. In the footsteps
of a man who probably never would have set foot near to the
Vatican. Except maybe to throw a Molotov cocktail or two.
Because, as far as the Roman authorities 2000 years ago were
concerned, this man called Jesus, son of Joseph, was a terrorist.
A long-haired, sandal-wearing member of the lumpen. A rabble-rousing
low-life of a carpenter.
So that 2000 years later, that the church built on the foundation
of this mans teachings could be in the name of the empire,
the oppressor, well, its more than a little ironic.
But I know Jesus as well as I knew Pope John Paul. I have
a sense of both that is a lot legend and little bit of the
essence of the man. Distorted, changed, prettified and made
acceptable to someone elses notions of what this man
should be.
How to make sense of a church that is so contrived? Trying
to make sense of a man who at once stood against poverty,
but sought to snuff out the work of priest/revolutionaries
like Paulo Friere, who dared to take Christianity back to
what I have a feeling the man called Christ first envisioned
it to be through their liberation theology, embracing the
work of Mother Teresa but still standing firm against women
priests.
It doesnt make sense to me but maybe in matters of religion
sense doesnt necessarily come into consideration.
Where next for the church is the question. Where next, indeed,
in a time in western Europe when the faithful have lost faith
and those who stay flout all the dogma without batting an
eye.
Will they take some kind of affirmative action and dare elect
a black Pope, seeing that its only in the countries
of the south that the churchs numbers have stayed constant?
Or will they see John Pauls passing as the end of an
era of conservatism and a time to change old ways in an effort
to re-embrace the many that have turned away in search of
something that is more real and less bound up in arcane ritual
and no-longer-relevant traditions.
Not a dry eye on the streets surrounding St Peters Basilica
and, in some scenes, devoted pilgrims become ungodly seething
mobs, breaking through barriers to get a last glimpse of their
pope.
And I wonder if they shed tears for the loss of a spiritual
leader? Or do they shed tears for their own folly at needing
someone else to tell them the difference between right and
wrong.
Ah we humans. Always searching for someone to look up to.
Always denying our own god-like state, always somehow missing
the point of our being all Gods children. As if the
same god of whom the pope is an elected representative wouldnt
bestow that gift on all his children.
Surely this is a case of some animals being more equal than
others?