The Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) is one of the most
important pieces of legislation to have been passed in the
last decade. It can cause a revolution in our democracy, because
the people can actually monitor government and public authorities
themselves.
Imagine having the power and being able to ask for what was
hitherto secret correspondence between the Public Service
Commission and the Prime Minister to determine whether the
latter blocked your promotion, the minutes of meetings, special
reports and policy papers, etc.
The significance of FOIA was explained by Justice Fennelly
in Barney Sheedy v The Minister of Education and
The Irish Times Ltd as follows:
The passing of the FOIA constituted a legislative development
of major importance. By it, the Oireachtas took a considered
and deliberate step which dramatically alters the administrative
assumptions and culture of centuries. It replaces the presumption
of secrecy with one of openness. It is designed to open up
the workings of government and administration to scrutiny.
It is not designed simply to satisfy the appetite of the media
for stories. It is for the benefit of every citizen.
It lets light in to the offices and filing cabinets of our
rulers. The principle of free access to publicly held information
is part of a world-wide trend. The general assumption is that
it originates in the Scandinavian countries. The Treaty of
Amsterdam adopted a new Article 255 of the EC Treaty providing
that every citizen of the European Union should have access
to the documents of the European Parliament, Council and Commission.
The public service and bureaucracy of government painfully
and slowly has to come to terms with the fact that citizens
now have a right to shine a torchlight into their sacred places.
This is a significant development because evidence of discrimination
and unfairness is oftentimes secreted within the bosom of
state agencies.
The FOIA has prompted an avalanche of judicial review applications
as public authorities that have grown accustomed to the political
culture of non-accountability and secrecy tries to cope with
the prying tentacles of the FOIA.
The FOIA has created a mini-revolution in the concept of transparency
and participatory democracy. The object of the Act as stated
in Section 3 is to create a general right of access
to information in documentary form and the provisions
of the Act are to be interpreted in a manner that facilitates
and promotes promptly and at the lowest reasonable cost,
the disclosure of information.
If a public authority refuses access to the requested information,
the aggrieved citizen has the right to apply for judicial
review or make a complaint to the ombudsman. There are many
defences open to public authorities however, they cannot be
flippantly invoked as an excuse to deny access to information:
the courts and the ombudsman must lift the veil and scrutinise
the defence invoked by the public authority to see whether
it is relevant, genuine and justified.
An application under the FOIA is free. The form is available
at the back of the Act which can be easily downloaded from
the Parliament Web site or the Office of the
Attorney General.
For the time being, the requested information is free as no
fees have been prescribed. Dont be deterred if you are
refused access as most public authorities are unclear and
uncertain as to when they can properly invoke the defences
available under the FOIA and their natural instinctive reaction
is to preserve the status quo by denying the public access
to secret documents.
Secret documents are anything that the public was not entitled
to before the FOIA, which is nothing. But rest assured that
you can challenge any refusal via the courts and the ombudsman.
The latter challenge is free.
The FOIA is simple and easy to use. It is designed for the
responsible and conscious citizen. You dont need a lawyer
to help you make an application and the Act is easy to read
and understand.
Had the Integrity Commission (IC) not been exempted, the public
would have been entitled to request information about how
many public officials were secretly granted exemptions by
the IC and even ask for a copy of the letter that was written
to the judges and magistrates.
I trust that now that I have explained the penetrating power
and impact of the FOIA and its usefulness in the fight for
accountability, integrity and transparency in public life,
that the public would be more alert to moves by the Government
to exempt public institutions from the Act.
The mischief of the exemptions granted by the IC would have
been exposed a lot easier and earlier had the Government not
exempted it. The current fiasco is a good illustration of
why this exemption was both ill-advised and unwarranted. Unless
of course, it almost achieved the desired objective of keeping
these exemptions secret.