Friday 2nd June, 2006

 
Letters
 
 
 
 
Sports Arena
Womanwise
Business Guardian
 
Letters
Online Community
Death Notices
 
Advertising
Classified Ads
Jobs in T&T
Contact Us
 
Archives
Privacy Policy
 
 
 

 

UNC’s doing vibrant and assertive work

On behalf of the United National Congress, I wish to respond to your editorial of May 24, headlined “Think about country, UNC.”

You write in your editorial about “the internal wrangling” having “diminished” the effectiveness of the UNC as T&T’s parliamentary opposition.

I regret that you have adopted that posture since, as a daily newspaper, you would be conscious of the UNC’s on-going vibrant and assertive work in both the parliamentary and wider political arenas.

Our elected and nominated representatives in both Houses of Parliament continue to hold the Government to account and to expose wrongdoing which, in some instances, amount to millions of dollars’ worth of taxpayers’ funds.

For example, the Public Enterprises (Accounts) Committee, which is chaired by our Senator Wade Mark, recently exposed blatant corruption with respect to the purchase of two cranes by Plipdeco. The sum involved here is about $52 million. I acknowledge that your newspaper wrote on this issue, but I can’t recall an editorial on the subject.

There are several other critical issues that the UNC has placed on the national agenda. Do you recall, for example, that it was our Senator Jennifer Jones-Kernahan who told the Senate in April that the blood of our youths is on the hands of the Patrick Manning administration?

Senator Jones-Kernahan spoke following the sordid death of Sean Luke and in respect of the Children’s Authority Act, which is still to be put into effect.

Yet the Government twiddled its fingers on this vital legislation, leading to the gruesome abuse and murder of little Amy Emily Annamunthodo.

I could list a number of other significant matters unearthed and exposed by the UNC. They include the blatant absence of accountability with respect to multi-million-dollar state contracts. Indeed, some of those issues aired by the UNC were later confirmed in the latest review by the Auditor General.

The UNC has been speaking relentlessly on issues of housing, the environment, health, traffic horrors, education, energy and, of course, the continuously worsening crime scenario. On each occasion we have proposed alternatives to the current state of affairs.

The UNC has detailed the threats to our democracy through a series of disturbing developments engineered by the Patrick Manning administration, including the current high-handed and dictatorial handling of the impasse in the judiciary.

The party has outlined the deeply worrying danger being posed to several vital national institutions and the gross attempt to erode the separation of powers.

In short, the UNC has been extremely focused and hands-on as a vigilant watchdog on a rampant and tyrannical government. We continuously monitor and review the performance of this inept and repressive administration and respond through several mechanisms.

One means of expressing our informed views is via news releases, some of which—we are gratified to be able to say—manage to make it to the pages of the Guardian.

We also air balanced and sober analyses at our regular public meetings, at news conferences and other fora to all of which the Guardian is invited and welcomed.

I end by assuring both the Guardian and the national community that the UNC is a competent and hard-working political opposition that consistently reviews the performance of the Government and comments critically when necessary, always proffering workable alternative positions.

Vasant Bharath

Deputy chairman, UNC


Jack, Kamla out to destroy UNC?

During a period of trying to stave off sleep, I continued listening to a UNC meeting from Princes Town. It definitely was an enormous task to listen to a lacklustre and mediocre platform, which was in no way helped my an inept chairman.

The young Panday girl is destined for stardom, having already had some exposure in the film industry, but most of the others did not merit much attention.

Perhaps the most interesting statements of the night came from Jack and Kamla, who both said they were prepared to stay in Opposition, rather than to sell their souls.

Was it not the said Kamla who referred to Basdeo Panday as her Maha Guru? Was it not the said Panday who said he will sleep with the devil to remove the PNM? Is Kamla now distancing herself from her Maha Guru?

The least said about Jack the better. Here is a man who is displaying an amazing and obscene sense of sycophancy by saying to call him Jack Panday. He gives the impression that he wants to replace Basdeo in all forms and fashion.

They are not interested in allowing the party a chance to get into government. Are they on a quest to destroy the UNC once and for all?

Margaret Singh

Palmiste


Replace it with Honour of Trinbago

The recent ruling of Justice Jamadar on the Trinity Cross is a landmark decision in the development of our people and our society.

At the time when the Trinity Cross was conceived, we had just been granted our independence and had just stepped out of colonialism, so to speak. But the nostalgia of the colonial past seemed to have captured the imagination of the framers of the national awards and thus our highest award was fashioned after the Victoria Cross of England. It was simply a colonial thing and therefore no blame can be ascribed to those who designed the Trinity Cross.

Now we have moved ahead in our political development and, as a republic, we need to affirm the aspirations of all peoples who live in this beautiful rainbow country of ours. The Government must now quickly seek to correct this misnomer and produce a name for our highest honour that will be in keeping with our sovereignty.

I suggest we call it The Honour of Trinbago with the motif of the sugar cane, oil and pan imprinted on the medal. I am sure that our gifted artists could come up with a suitable design. The Honour of Trinbago should now replace The Trinity Cross.

Over to you, PM Manning!

Richard Kokaram

Curepe


Not surprised at Rahman’s view

MF Rahman in “Fair reflection of teachings” claimed that the Da Vinci Code won’t do anything to impair indoctrinated faith.

I agree. It could not possibly harm, weaken, prejudice or mess up Islamic faith because Islam supports at least two errant and unhistoric views of Dan Brown:

n That the evangelists deified Jesus. After all, he was just a man whose carnality, perhaps like Muhammad’s, was characterised by the quality of being sensual and had a fondness to indulge in sexual pleasures with a harem of wives.

n That Jesus never died. His crucifixion was all a hoax.

So, I am not at all surprised at Rahman’s subjective view that he found the film less offensive than expected.

AL Nunes

Diego Martin


Restrict use of DVDs in vehicles

I READ with interest in the April 25 Guardian that legislation would be drafted to limit the use of cellphones while driving. This is obviously being done to increase the safety of motorists, cyclists and pedestrians.

I would also like to suggest to those responsible for this legislation take into consideration limiting the use of DVD monitors in vehicles.

Too often I have seen people looking at movies and music videos while driving. Too often I have seen accidents, some fatal, where the cars are fitted with DVD monitors.

I think that with the introduction of the breathalyser, restriction of the use of cellphones and DVD monitors and an educational and safety programme geared towards road users and pedestrians there will be a reduction in road fatalities.

Roger Supersad

Fyzabad


Mr Minister, is this one for 555?

Can I ask the CoP, head of the SAUTT, the inspector in charge of the St Joseph Police Station to update me about the current management of distress calls from business places in particular?

On May 26, at about 1.55 am, calls were made to E-999 and the St Joseph police about possible intruders at a recently established business at Valsayn and, up to the time of writing this letter (May 27 at 7.30 am), I had not received a call from any one of these agencies.

I think it would be absurd, considering the above, for the police only to make an appearance after calamities occur.

Mr Minister of National Security, do you agree? Can this be considered racketeering, corruption or any other offence that can be reported to the 555?

D Moonan

Valsayn

©2005-2006 Trinidad Publishing Company Limited

Designed by: Randall Rajkumar-Maharaj · Updated daily by: Sheahan Farrell