Tuesday 18th December, 2007

 

David E Bratt, MD

 
 
 
 
Sports Arena
Womanwise
Business Guardian
 
Letters
Online Community
Death Notices
 
Advertising
Classified Ads
Jobs in T&T
Contact Us
 
Archives
Privacy Policy
 
 
 

 

dbratt@trinidad.net

The ‘war’ on cancer

  • So-called ‘war on cancer’ in the US was intentionally misguided from its start.
  • The Nazis ran the first public advertisements that warned of the dangers of smoking.
  • The environment we live in causes cancer.

Devra Davis has written a book called The Secret History of the War on Cancer that should be required bedtime reading for any politician interested in anything more than the local cocktail party circuit, or anyone interested in finding out about the causes of cancer.

Dr Davis is the director of the Center for Environmental Oncology at the University of Pittsburg Cancer Institute and a professor in the Department of Epidemiology, Graduate School of Public Health.

Her book tells the story of the sordid history of how research into the environmental causes of cancer was and is being systematically and deliberately ignored, hidden or discredited by powerful politicians, industrialists and sadly, doctors.

The thesis of the book is that the so-called “war on cancer” in the US was intentionally misguided from its start in 1971, by insisting that a “cure” for something called cancer, really about 200 different diseases, was possible and that prevention was a waste of time.

The end result is that more than 30 years after the “war” began, even though enormous strides in treatment have taken place, there is still no cure and the elements that cause the different kinds of cancer are still out there, even though the main causes of cancer have been known since the 1930s.

One of the astonishing things you learn in the book is that the Nazis ran the first public advertisements that warned of the dangers of smoking and in 1939 actually banned smoking in public places.

As is usual when asking why this undue emphasis on treatment happened, “Follow the money,” the memorable quote from All the President’s Men which Deep Throat advised Bob Woodward, is the key to understanding this “war on cancer” mystery. And it is a lot of money, at present more than US$100 billion in direct treatment costs in one year.

From the beginning the “cancer war” was characterised by a “revolving door” policy of cancer researchers and administrators in and out of the cancer-causing industries, tobacco, petroleum, asbestos, chemical and pesticide, and food and drugs.

Many of the leading figures in the fight against cancer in both the US and the UK seem to have profited, both from producing cancer-causing chemicals and from producing anti-cancer drugs.

Prominent scientists like Dr Clarence Cook Little, pictured on the cover of Time magazine in 1937 and who headed the American Cancer Society in 1944 and then became the founding director of the Scientific Advisory Board of the Tobacco Industry Research Council; Sir Richard Doll, who co-authored the study on British physicians in the early 60s that made me stop smoking; Hans-Olav Adami of the Swedish Karolinska Institute, and Dimitri Trichlopoulos of the Harvard School of Public Health, all secretly worked for the chemical industry for years and did not disclose these ties even when providing advice to governments on subjects of direct interest to their bosses.

From the beginning the American Cancer Society was dominated by titans of industry, who made it their duty not only to push cancer research in the direction of expensive drugs but to cast doubt on any research that implicated the environment as a cause of cancers.

One of their first appointments was to hire the dean of modern public relations, Edward Bernays, who pioneered the introduction of “tobacco experts,” articulate professional sceptics, to sew the seeds of doubt in the minds of the public about the causes of cancer, much like the aluminium smelter people do today.

Mr Bernays is the one who came up with the idea to present smoking as a solution to being fat. One famous ad for Lucky Strike read, “Reach for a Lucky instead of a sweet.” He was also the genius behind the move to encourage women to smoke as a sign of the feminist movement. I can remember the ads on the backs of women’s magazines saying, “You’re free, baby. Light up!”

To prevent cancer, in the 12th century, the famous Jewish physician Maimonides advised staying away from dusty cities and dirty air, eating chicken soup and garlic and getting regular exercise.

He was correct. Most cancer develops not because who our parents were but because of what happens to us after we are born. Where and how we live and work, what we eat, how we spend our private time, how we move about: all these things affect the kind of health we will have.

Heat, cold, dust, dirt, radiation, soot, fumes and myriad natural and synthetic agents combine to affect the chances that anyone will get cancer.

There is no longer any doubt. The environment we live in causes cancers.

Will anyone pay attention to this little article? No. Will anyone remember? No. Most of you reading this will be dead of cancer in the next few years or so, years before your children and grandchildren die of the same thing. Most of you will go bleatingly to your death crying, “Why?”

The answer is all around you.

©2005-2006 Trinidad Publishing Company Limited

Designed by: Randall Rajkumar-Maharaj · Updated daily by: Sheahan Farrell